Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Photobiomodulation isolated or associated with adipose-derived stem cells allograft improves inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the delayed-healing wound in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Bagheri Tadi F., Noori Mougehi SM., Mostafavinia A., Moheghi A., Amini A., Rezaei F.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 6 on Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in Lasers Med Sci (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Lasers Med Sci (2022)
Country
England
Reported sample size
6
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36006574
DOI
10.1007/s10103-022-03630-z
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

The single and associated impressions of photobiomodulation (PBM) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADS) on stereological parameters (SP), and gene expression (GE) of some antioxidant and oxidative stressors of repairing injured skin at inflammation and proliferation steps (days 4 and 8) of a delayed healing, ischemic, and infected wound model (DHIIWM) were examined in type one diabetic (DM1) rats. DM1 was induced by administration of streptozotocin (40 mg/kg) in 48 rats. The DHIIWM was infected by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The study comprised 4 groups (each, n = 6): Group 1 was the control group (CG). Group 2 received allograft human (h) ADSs transplanted into the wound. In group 3, PBM (890 nm, 80 Hz, 0.2 J/cm 2 ) was emitted, and in group 4, a combination of PBM+ADS was used. At both studied time points, PBM+ADS, PBM, and ADS significantly decreased inflammatory cell count (p < 0.05) and increased granulation tissue formation compared to CG (p < 0.05). Similarly, there were lower inflammatory cells, as well as higher granulation tissue in the PBM+ADS compared to those of alone PBM and ADS (all, p < 0.001). At both studied time points, the GE of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) was remarkably higher in all treatment groups than in CG (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, the outcomes of the PBM+ADS group were higher than the single effects of PBM and

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AllograftsAnimalsAntioxidantsCatalaseDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalHumansIschemiaLow-Level Light TherapyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNADPH Oxidases

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research