Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

The physiological and pathogenic roles of yes-associated protein/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif in bone or skeletal motor system-related cells

Huang Y., Ouyang X., Tan J., Meng Z., Ma X., Yan Y.

Narrative Review on Hip, published in Cytojournal (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cytojournal (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40134564
PMCID
PMC11932947
DOI
10.25259/cytojournal_237_2024
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) are the primary downstream effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway. This pathway plays a crucial role in regulating organ size, maintaining tissue homeostasis, and controlling cellular processes such as fate determination and tissue development. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of how the transcriptional regulators YAP and TAZ contribute to the physiological and pathological processes in tissues and cells associated with the skeletal motor system. The underlying molecular mechanisms and mechanical transduction were reviewed.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research