Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Potential of mesenchymal stem cell applications in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Weyand B., Vogt PM.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol (2013)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23128957
DOI
10.1007/10_2012_162
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

: Novel therapy with mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or other sources has raised high hopes for treatment of a variety of diseases. For plastic and reconstructive surgery, first pilot studies and clinical trials using stem cells for treatment of chronic wounds, radiation injury, or soft tissue augmentation have furnished encouraging results compared with the limitations of standard therapy, for example autologous fat grafting. Further research must be conducted to reveal the complex physiological interactions between activated stem cells and the host environment. Long-term effects and safety aspects of these novel treatment options also require randomized controlled studies. For future clinical applications, guidelines and standardized procedures for stem cell isolation and preparation, and techniques for application must be established.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research