Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

The Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Treating Spinocerebellar Ataxia: Advances and Future Directions

Lee GB., Park SM., Jung UJ., Kim SR.

Clinical Trial on Immune Modulation, published in Biomedicines (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Biomedicines (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39595073
PMCID
PMC11591855
DOI
10.3390/biomedicines12112507
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by impaired balance and coordination caused by cerebellar dysfunction. The absence of treatments approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for SCA has driven the investigation of alternative therapeutic strategies, including stem cell therapy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), known for their multipotent capabilities, have demonstrated significant potential in treating SCA. This review examines how MSCs may promote neuronal growth, enhance synaptic connectivity, and modulate brain inflammation. Recent findings from preclinical and clinical studies are also reviewed, emphasizing the promise of MSC therapy in addressing the unmet needs of SCA patients. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials and future directions are proposed to address the limitations of the current approaches.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research