Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Precision exosome engineering for enhanced wound healing and scar revision

Liu C., Cheng C., Cheng K., Gao AS., Li Q., Atala A.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in J Transl Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
J Transl Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40410904
PMCID
PMC12103044
DOI
10.1186/s12967-025-06578-0
Citations
17

Abstract (original English)

The dysfunction of wound-healing processes can result in chronic non-healing wounds and pathological scar formation. Current treatment options often fall short, necessitating innovative approaches. Exosomes, extracellular vesicles secreted by various cells, have emerged as promising therapeutic agents serving as an intercellular communication system. By engineering exosomes, their cargo and surface properties can be tailored to enhance therapeutic efficacy and specificity. Engineered exosomes (eExo) are emerging as a favorable tool for treating non-healing wounds and pathological scars. In this review, we delve into the underlying mechanisms of non-healing wounds and pathological scars, outline the current state of engineering strategies, and explore the clinical potential of eExo based on preclinical and clinical studies. In addition, we address the current challenges and future research directions, including standardization, safety and efficacy assessments, and potential immune responses. In conclusion, eExo hold great promise as a novel therapeutic approach for non-healing wounds and non-healing wounds and pathological scars. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to translate preclinical findings into effective clinical treatments.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
CicatrixAnimalsHumansWound HealingExosomes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research