Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Preclinical Studies of Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Disease

Tompkins BA., Balkan W., Winkler J., Gyöngyösi M., Goliasch G., Fernández-Avilés F.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Circ Res (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Circ Res (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29599277
PMCID
PMC7340290
DOI
10.1161/circresaha.117.312486
Citations
114

Abstract (original English)

As part of the TACTICS (Transnational Alliance for Regenerative Therapies in Cardiovascular Syndromes) series to enhance regenerative medicine, here, we discuss the role of preclinical studies designed to advance stem cell therapies for cardiovascular disease. The quality of this research has improved over the past 10 to 15 years and overall indicates that cell therapy promotes cardiac repair. However, many issues remain, including inability to provide complete cardiac recovery. Recent studies question the need for intact cells suggesting that harnessing what the cells release is the solution. Our contribution describes important breakthroughs and current directions in a cell-based approach to alleviating cardiovascular disease.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsHumansHeart DiseasesStem Cell TransplantationCellular Reprogramming TechniquesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research