Promises and Pitfalls of Regenerative Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Photobiomodulation, Stem Cells, and Exosomes
Gupta AK., Wang T., Welter R., Unger R., Mejia R.
Narrative Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Med Sci (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Med Sci (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41562895
- PMCID
- PMC12821594
- DOI
- 10.3390/medsci14010005
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Background Regenerative therapies have emerged in recent years. In particular, their utility in managing androgenetic alopecia-the most prevalent hair loss condition worldwide, affecting up to half of adults-is an active area of research. Navigating this space can be challenging for physicians due to widespread commercialization, lack of high-quality evidence, and an evolving regulatory landscape. Objective To critically review recently published evidence (2020-2025) on platelet-rich plasma, photobiomodulation, stem cells, and exosomes for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Methods A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials in February and November of 2025. Combination therapies were excluded. Results and conclusions Platelet-rich plasma is the most studied modality, with emerging investigations into newer formulations such as leukocyte-rich and pure platelet-rich plasma. However, recent studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of cellular composition, short follow-up durations, and a lack of comparative data on treatment protocols. The efficacy of photobiomodulation as a monotherapy remains debated, with inconsistent reporting of device parameters. Stem cells and exosomes show promising, though still limited, clinical evidence in inducing hair regrowth. Standardization of these therapies is crucial, with
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The suitability of mesenchymal stem cells for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 609 on Hair Loss, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Dermatol Reports (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 609
Dermatol Reports - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 724 on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 724
Stem Cell Res Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
DKK3-CKAP4 signaling drives fibroimmune remodeling and hair follicle miniaturization in androgenetic alopecia
Meta-analysis on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Theranostics (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Theranostics - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 24 on Chronic Wound, Burns, Hair Loss, published in J Int Med Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 24
J Int Med Res1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes in hair regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in World J Stem Cells (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
World J Stem Cells2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Exosomes and Hair Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Across Alopecia Types and Exosome Sources.
Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol6 citations