Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Protein Profiling of Mechanically Processed Lipoaspirates: Discovering Wound Healing and Antifibrotic Biomarkers in Nanofat.

Sanchez-Macedo N., McLuckie M., Grünherz L., Lindenblatt N.

Prospective Study on Chronic Wound, Scar, Skin Aging, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35666150
PMCID
PMC10231932
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000009345
Citations
20

Abstract (original English)

Background Nanofat is an injectable oily emulsion, rich in adipose-derived stem cells and growth factors. It is prepared from lipoaspirates through mechanical emulsification and filtration. Despite being successfully used in several procedures in regenerative medicine such as scar attenuation, skin rejuvenation, and treatment of chronic wounds, little is known about exactly how nanofat induces regeneration in treated skin at the molecular level. Methods Microfat and nanofat samples were isolated from 18 healthy patients. Proteomic profiling was performed through untargeted mass spectrometry proteomics and multiplex antibody arrays. Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins between microfat and nanofat was performed using Gene Ontology, Reactome, and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes as reference databases. Results Untargeted proteomics showed that up-regulated genes in nanofat are involved in innate immunity responses, coagulation, and wound healing, whereas down-regulated genes were linked to cellular migration and extracellular matrix production. Secretome array screening of microfat and nanofat samples showed no significantly different expression, which strongly suggests that the mechanical emulsification step does not affect the concentration of tissue regeneration biomarkers. The identified proteins are involved in wound healing, cellular migr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueBiomarkersHumansInflammationProteomicsRejuvenationWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research