Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Proteomics analysis of the effect and mechanism of ADSCs on full-thickness skin defects in diabetic rats].

Gu Y., Chen YZ., Wang SY., Song HY., Bai N.

Animal Study on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, published in Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi (2026)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41611293
PMCID
PMC12835853
DOI
10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240617-00236

Abstract (original English)

Objective: To explore the effect and mechanism of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) on full-thickness skin defects in diabetic rats using proteomics analysis. Methods: This study was a self-control design experimental study. Four 8 to 10 weeks old male Sprague-Dawley rats were selected, and ADSCs were extracted from their epididymal adipose tissue and successfully identified. The third passage of ADSCs were used for the following experiments. Twenty-four 4 to 6 weeks old male Sprague-Dawley rats were selected and the type 2 diabetes model was successfully established. Among them, 16 diabetic rats weighing 350 to 400 g were chosen, and a full-thickness skin defect wound was created on each side of the spine on their backs at the same level. Using the random number table method, the two wounds of each rat were included in experimental group and control group (with 16 wounds in each group), and the cell suspensions containing ADSCs and phosphate buffered saline were injected at multiple points around and at the base of the wounds immediately after injury, respectively. The wound healing rates were calculated at day 7, 10, and 14 after injury in rats. At day 7 after injury in rats, wound tissue was collected and proteins were extracted. Four-dimensional data-independent acquisition label-free quantitative proteomics technology was used for quantitative proteomics analy

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyWound HealingProteomicsRatsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalMesenchymal Stem CellsSkinAdipose Tissue

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research