Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Bone Healing: Molecular Pathways and Clinical Applications

Caliogna L., Medetti M., Bina V., Brancato AM., Castelli A., Jannelli E.

Clinical Trial on Hip, published in Int J Mol Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34299021
PMCID
PMC8303968
DOI
10.3390/ijms22147403
Citations
53

Abstract (original English)

In this article, we provide an extensive review of the recent literature of the signaling pathways modulated by Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) and PEMFs clinical application. A review of the literature was performed on two medical electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) from 3 to 5 March 2021. Three authors performed the evaluation of the studies and the data extraction. All studies for this review were selected following these inclusion criteria: studies written in English, studies available in full text and studies published in peer-reviewed journal. Molecular biology, identifying cell membrane receptors and pathways involved in bone healing, and studying PEMFs target of action are giving a solid basis for clinical applications of PEMFs. However, further biology studies and clinical trials with clear and standardized parameters (intensity, frequency, dose, duration, type of coil) are required to clarify the precise dose-response relationship and to understand the real applications in clinical practice of PEMFs.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsHumansSignal TransductionOsteogenesisElectromagnetic FieldsDatabases, FactualFractures, BoneMagnetic Field Therapy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research