Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Purinergic signaling in diabetes and metabolism

Jain S., Jacobson KA.

Narrative Review on Burns, published in Biochem Pharmacol (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biochem Pharmacol (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33359363
PMCID
PMC8096664
DOI
10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114393
Citations
45

Abstract (original English)

Purinergic signaling, a concept originally formulated by the late Geoffrey Burnstock (1929-2020), was found to modulate pathways in every physiological system. In metabolic disorders there is a role for both adenosine receptors and P2 (nucleotide) receptors, of which there are two classes, i.e. P2Y metabotropic and P2X ionotropic receptors. The individual roles of the 19 receptors encompassed by this family have been dissected - and in many cases the effects associated with specific cell types, including adipocytes, skeletal muscle, liver cells and immune cells. It is suggested that ligands selective for each of the four adenosine receptors (A 1 , A 2A , A 2B and A 3 ), and several of the P2 subtypes (e.g. P2Y 6 or P2X7 antagonists) might have therapeutic potential for treating diabetes and obesity. This is a developing story with some conflicting conclusions relevant to drug discovery, which we summarize here.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansMetabolic DiseasesDiabetes MellitusReceptors, PurinergicAdenosine TriphosphateSignal TransductionPurinergic AgonistsPurinergic Antagonists

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research