Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Recent advances in electrospun nanofibers for wound healing

Chen S., Liu B., Carlson MA., Gombart AF., Reilly DA., Xie J.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Nanomedicine (Lond) (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Nanomedicine (Lond) (2017)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
28520509
PMCID
PMC6661929
DOI
10.2217/nnm-2017-0017
Citations
194

Abstract (original English)

Electrospun nanofibers represent a novel class of materials that show great potential in many biomedical applications including biosensing, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, drug delivery and wound healing. In this work, we review recent advances in electrospun nanofibers for wound healing. This article begins with a brief introduction on the wound, and then discusses the unique features of electrospun nanofibers critical for wound healing. It further highlights recent studies that have used electrospun nanofibers for wound healing applications and devices, including sutures, multifunctional dressings, dermal substitutes, engineered epidermis and full-thickness skin regeneration. Finally, we finish with conclusions and future perspective in this field.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
SkinAnimalsHumansDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignBandagesSkin, ArtificialSuturesRegenerative MedicineRegeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research