Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Reconstruction of rabbit corneal epithelium using adipose and / or bone marrow stem cells.

Hassan TA., Abouelela YS., Ahmed ZSO., Ibrahim MA., Rizk H., Tolba A.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Exp Eye Res (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Exp Eye Res (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39667486
DOI
10.1016/j.exer.2024.110203

Abstract (original English)

One of the main causes of corneal blindness is corneal alkali burn, which can also result in serious side effects such as limbal stem cell deficit, corneal perforation, and permanent epithelial abnormalities. This study set out to investigate the therapeutic potential of ADMSCs and BMMSCs for the reconstruction of the corneal surface after chemical alkali burn. Twelve adult rabbits were divided equally into four groups. Each rabbit in the other groups had a chemical alkali burn applied to their right eye using 6 mm-wide NaoH soaked filter paper, while the negative control group had no intervention. All groups except negative control group received topical and subconjunctival injections. Group I (Negative control) received no therapy, whereas Group II received an injection of phosphate-buffered saline as the positive control. Group III received 1 mL of ADMSCs, while Group IV received 1 mL of BMMSCs. After 4 weeks, the corneal tissue underwent morphological, histological, immunohistochemical examination and gene expression. The ocular tissue underwent histopathological examination revealed re-epithelialization and nearly normal architecture in the BMMSC-treated group. The injured cornea treated with ADMSCs showed partial repair of the anterior epithelium, in addition to inflammatory cells infiltration. An immunohistochemical analysis revealed that, compared to ADMSCs and positive

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsRabbitsBurns, ChemicalEye BurnsEpithelium, CornealDisease Models, AnimalAdipose TissueMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRe-EpithelializationMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research