Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

[Regenerative medicine for heart failure].

Nagaya N., Kitamura S.

Clinical Trial on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Nihon Rinsho (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Nihon Rinsho (2008)
Country
Japan
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18464520

Abstract (original English)

Heart failure is one of the most important cardiovascular health problems throughout the world and has high mortality, and there is a need to develop more effective therapeutic strategies to replace such specialized treatment as mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are multipotent plastic-adherent cells obtained from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other tissues and can be easily expanded in culture. MSC exert their role in cardiac regeneration not only by differentiating into specific cell types such as cardiomyocytes and vascular endothelial cells but also through paracrine effects via secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors. On the basis of information obtained from basic and translational research, several clinical trials have recently been started to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous MSC for heart failure.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
ApoptosisBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationClinical Trials as TopicHeart FailureHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocytes, Cardiac

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research