Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Regenerative Medicine for Skin Health: From Principles to Practice (Part I).

Wyles S., Proffer SL., Pastore L., Avram M., Mariwalla K., Bertucci V.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in J Am Acad Dermatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Am Acad Dermatol (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41621670
DOI
10.1016/j.jaad.2025.05.1466

Abstract (original English)

Regenerative medicine is a rapidly evolving field focused on restoring tissue form and function by harnessing the body's intrinsic reparative mechanisms. In dermatology, regenerative strategies include both cellular therapies (e.g., stem cells) and acellular products (e.g., biostimulatory polymers and exosomes), emphasizing the need for responsible translation from conceptual innovation to clinical application. The 21st Century Cures Act has accelerated the development of regenerative therapies through the Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation, which supports products that address serious diseases or unmet medical needs. Guided by the "from the patient to the patient" paradigm, this article reviews the regenerative medicine lexicon, evolving biotechnologies, and strategies for patient management. As many current therapies enhance healing rather than achieve full tissue regeneration, careful distinction and evidence-based evaluation are critical. Regenerative biotherapeutics hold promise to transform dermatologic care by targeting root causes of disease and advancing skin health.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research