Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Regenerative medicine strategies for hair growth and regeneration: A narrative review of literature.

Shimizu Y., Ntege EH., Sunami H., Inoue Y.

Narrative Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Regen Ther (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36382136
PMCID
PMC9637724
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2022.10.005
Citations
77

Abstract (original English)

Hair loss, or alopecia, is associated with several psychosocial and medical comorbidities, and it remains an economic burden to individuals and the society. Alopecia is attributable to varied mechanisms and features a multifactorial predisposition, and the available conventional medical interventions have several limitations. Thus, several therapeutic strategies for alopecia in regenerative medicine are currently being explored, with increasing evidence suggesting that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) implantation, MSC-derived secretome treatment, and blood-derived platelet-rich plasma therapies are potential treatment options. In this review, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Scopus using various combinations of terms, such as "stem cell," "alopecia," "hair loss," "Androgenetic alopecia," "male-pattern hair loss," "female-pattern hair loss," "regenerative hair growth," "cell therapy," "mesenchymal stem cells," "MSC-derived extracellular vesicles," "MSC-derived exosomes," and "platelet-rich plasma" and summarized the most promising regenerative treatments for alopecia. Moreover, further opportunities of improving efficacy and innovative strategies for promoting clinical application were discussed.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research