The Regenerative Power of Erythropoietin in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Pruzzo V., Bonomi F., Limido E., Weinzierl A., Harder Y., Laschke MW.
Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2026)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 41572904
- DOI
- 10.1177/19373368251414483
Abstract (original English)
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone stimulating erythropoiesis. Over the last two decades, EPO has additionally gained attention as a therapeutic compound in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This is mainly due to its pleiotropic action profile, which promotes angiogenesis, suppresses apoptosis, and modulates inflammation, resulting in enhanced tissue regeneration. Accordingly, many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of EPO and its derivatives in the management of wound healing, flap surgery, peripheral nerve regeneration, fat grafting, and bone repair. However, for the broad clinical implementation of EPO as a therapeutic in these fields, several critical steps are yet to be taken. These include the development of standardized and safe treatment protocols and their evaluation in randomized multicenter clinical trials for the establishment of personalized, targeted therapies adapted to the specific needs of surgical patients. If this succeeds, EPO treatment may markedly improve the outcome of many different therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine and reconstructive surgery.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Safety of Fat Graft Myringoplasty Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma for Managing Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 522 on Chronic Wound, published in Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 522
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Best evidence summary for platelet-rich plasma treatment of chronic wounds
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Regen Ther - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Dedifferentiation of Mature Adipocytes and Their Future Potential for Regenerative Medicine Applications
Systematic Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, published in Biomedicines (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Biomedicines - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol