Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

The Regenerative Power of Erythropoietin in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Pruzzo V., Bonomi F., Limido E., Weinzierl A., Harder Y., Laschke MW.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Tissue Eng Part B Rev (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41572904
DOI
10.1177/19373368251414483

Abstract (original English)

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone stimulating erythropoiesis. Over the last two decades, EPO has additionally gained attention as a therapeutic compound in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This is mainly due to its pleiotropic action profile, which promotes angiogenesis, suppresses apoptosis, and modulates inflammation, resulting in enhanced tissue regeneration. Accordingly, many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of EPO and its derivatives in the management of wound healing, flap surgery, peripheral nerve regeneration, fat grafting, and bone repair. However, for the broad clinical implementation of EPO as a therapeutic in these fields, several critical steps are yet to be taken. These include the development of standardized and safe treatment protocols and their evaluation in randomized multicenter clinical trials for the establishment of personalized, targeted therapies adapted to the specific needs of surgical patients. If this succeeds, EPO treatment may markedly improve the outcome of many different therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine and reconstructive surgery.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research