Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Regenerative and stem cell-based techniques for facial rejuvenation.

Crowley JS., Liu A., Dobke M.

Narrative Review on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2021)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34102897
PMCID
PMC8381699
DOI
10.1177/15353702211020701
Citations
13

Abstract (original English)

This review discusses the most novel ideas and modalities being incorporated into facial rejuvenation. Recent innovative techniques include the use of regenerative stem cell techniques and regeneration supportive modalities such as nano-technology or gene therapies. This review aims to investigate approaches that are less well known and lacking established evidence in order to proactively study these techniques prior to them becoming popularized. These applications and relevant research were reviewed in the context of both surgical and non-surgical modalities in clinical practice. Future directions include the concept of "precision cosmetic medicine" utilizing gene editing and cellular therapies to tailor rejuvenation techniques based on each individual's genetic make-up and therefore needs.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyFaceHumansRegenerationRejuvenationStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research