Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy Optimization via Tissue Engineering in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Alkan M., Madanieh R., Shah NN., Dogar MU., Shah PN., Ishtiaq S.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Cardiovasc Eng Technol (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cardiovasc Eng Technol (2017)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28849552
DOI
10.1007/s13239-017-0325-y

Abstract (original English)

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is continuously rising in both the industrialized and non-industrialized nations. Despite current therapeutic advances, prognosis of HF patients remains poor. Presently, therapeutic pharmacological and device strategies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are mostly palliative and do not induce regeneration of lost myocardial tissue. Stem cell therapy has demonstrated promising results in clinical studies by promoting myocardial restoration in HFrEF subjects. Despite decades of investigation, many challenges remain unanswered to the widespread clinical application of stem cell therapy for HFrEF. This review will describe the foundational work already accomplished in cardiac stem cell therapy, advantages and limitations of the various candidates for tissue restoration, their presumed mechanisms of action, the role of scaffolding materials as well as the challenges that exist for widespread clinical application.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsEmbryonic Stem CellsHeart FailureHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyocardiumRegenerationStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research