Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

[Regenerative therapy approaches in plastic surgery].

Kuhbier JW., Reimers K., Radtke C., Vogt PM.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Chirurg (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Chirurg (2015)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25709000
DOI
10.1007/s00104-014-2830-y

Abstract (original English)

The regeneration of tissue lost due to trauma or disease is considered as being ideal for reconstruction with respect to repair in which a donor defect arises in a different part of the body. Through a better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of healing, possibilities for regenerative therapies have been developed in recent years. To give an exemplary representation of current regenerative therapy approaches and their effect and clinical application. The PubMed database was searched for different regenerative approaches in plastic surgery and various methods are presented in this article. Cell-based approaches, in which autologous mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue are preferably used, led to excellent healing results with minimal donor site morbidity. Likewise, growth factor-based approaches or the use of platelet-rich plasma achieve very good results in the field of wound and bone healing. By using different cells or molecules and thus taking advantage of biological mechanisms, the regenerative capabilities of adult organisms could be improved. Many methods have already been implemented in clinical practice, not only in reconstructive but also in aesthetic surgery. However, the success should not conceal the potential risk that is inherent in both cell and growth factor-based approaches. Until long-term experiences of such therapies have been acqu

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPlastic Surgery ProceduresReoperationStem Cell TransplantationSurgical FlapsWound HealingWounds and Injuries

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research