Research on the application effect of arthroscopic access modification in meniscal injury repair
Li S., Sun H., Zhang J., Guo H., Yan L., Tang F.
Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 100 on Meniscus Injury, published in J Orthop Surg Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Retrospective Study
- Journal
- J Orthop Surg Res (2025)
- Reported sample size
- 100
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39754209
- PMCID
- PMC11697758
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13018-024-05434-z
Abstract (original English)
Objective To investigate the application value of arthroscopic channel modification in meniscal injury repair. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 100 patients with meniscus injuries treated with knee arthroscopy from December 2022 to December 2023 and divided them into a control group and a modified group according to the application of "arthroscopic access modification technology". We compared the operation time, postoperative hospitalization time, VAS score, Lysholm knee function score, postoperative complications, and postoperative images of the patients in these two groups. We compared the operation time, postoperative hospitalization time, pre- and postoperative VAS scores, Lysholm knee function scores, postoperative complications and postoperative imaging indices of the patients in the two groups. Results All patients successfully underwent surgery and were followed up without intraoperative vascular or nerve injury or postoperative complications such as infection, wound necrosis or thrombosis. The average follow-up time was 16.03 ± 3.69 months; the average operation time and postoperative hospitalization time of the modified group were significantly better than those of the control group were (P 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion The improved arthroscopic access technique can make the entry and exit of instruments
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Optimizing Meniscus Allograft Transplantation - Reducing Extrusion and Restoring Joint Loading Mechanics: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging biologic augmentation strategies for meniscal repair: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 18 on Meniscus Injury, Chronic Wound, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
- n = 18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord7 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors and Potential Treatments
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Cureus (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Cureus1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 1: adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2022
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc40 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapy in soft tissue sports injuries of the knee: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 9 on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Expert Opin Biol Ther (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
- n = 9
Expert Opin Biol Ther10 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Stem cells application in meniscal tears: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical evidence.
Systematic Review on Meniscus Injury, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci