Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Research trends and hotspots in Adipose-Derived Stem Cell applications for peripheral nerve regeneration from 2000 to 2025: a bibliometrics visualization study.

Alves AS., Fabi A., Kalbermatten DF., Madduri S.

Narrative Review on Hip, published in Brain Spine (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Brain Spine (2026)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42368699
DOI
10.1016/j.bas.2026.106124

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) cause significant disability. Autologous nerve grafts remain the gold standard but are limited by donor-site morbidity, restricted graft availability, and inconsistent functional recovery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as promising adjuncts due to their accessibility and regenerative potential. Research question How has global research on ADSCs in peripheral nerve repair evolved, and what are the leading contributors, dominant themes, and emerging trends? Material and methods A bibliometric analysis was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection for studies published from January 2000 to September 2025. Predefined search terms for ADSCs and peripheral nerve repair were applied. VOSviewer (v1.6.20) and CiteSpace (v6.3.R1 Advanced) were used to build co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence networks and to assess thematic evolution. Results The final dataset comprised 555 articles authored by 2750 researchers from 54 countries and 849 institutions, citing 16,466 references. Global output increased consistently after 2011, with a peak in 2019. When adjusted for population size, Switzerland showed the highest research intensity (3.22 publications per million inhabitants), followed by Sweden (1.81), Belgium (1.12), and Austria (1.11). Countries with the highest absolute output, including the United

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research