Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

RETRACTION: Exosomes Derived From Adipose Tissue, Bone Marrow, and Umbilical Cord Blood for Cardioprotection After Myocardial Infarction.

Laboratory Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Cell Biochem (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Cell Biochem (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40948422
DOI
10.1002/jcb.70061

Abstract (original English)

H. Xu, Z. Wang, L. Liu, B. Zhang, and B. Li, "Exosomes Derived From Adipose Tissue, Bone Marrow, and Umbilical Cord Blood for Cardioprotection After Myocardial Infarction," Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 121, no. 3 (2020): 2089-2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27399. The above article, published online on 17 November 2019, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Christian Behl; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. A third party reported to the publisher that several images in the article included panels with overlapping samples. Those overlapping panels are as follows: Figure 1C and 1D have overlapping panels for BMMSC and ADMSC; Figure 2B has an overlapping panel between the Normal and Sham samples; and Figures 4B, 4C, and 4G each have several overlapping panels, several of which included rotated sections. In addition, the third party reported that several images in Figure 4C had been reused from a previously-published article by a different group of authors [Chen et al. 2018 (https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s163405)]. An investigation by the publisher confirmed each instance of image duplication and that several of the images had been re-used from the earlier paper. The retraction has been agreed to because the evidence of image duplication and manipulation compromises the integrity of the study and the conc

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research