Retrograde Coronary Venous Infusion as a Delivery Strategy in Regenerative Cardiac Therapy: an Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Data
Gathier WA., van Ginkel DJ., van der Naald M., van Slochteren FJ., Doevendans PA., Chamuleau SAJ.
Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Cardiovasc Transl Res (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Cardiovasc Transl Res (2018)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 29392536
- PMCID
- PMC5973989
- DOI
- 10.1007/s12265-018-9785-1
- Citations
- 15
Abstract (original English)
An important aspect of cell therapy in the field of cardiac disease is safe and effective delivery of cells. Commonly used delivery strategies such as intramyocardial injection and intracoronary infusion both present with advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, alternative delivery routes are explored, such as retrograde coronary venous infusion (RCVI). Our aim is to evaluate safety and efficiency of RCVI by providing a complete overview of preclinical and clinical studies applying RCVI in a broad range of disease types and experimental models. Available data on technical and safety aspects of RCVI are incomplete and insufficient. Improvement of cardiac function is seen after cell delivery via RCVI. However, cell retention in the heart after RCVI appears inferior compared to intracoronary infusion and intramyocardial injection. Adequately powered confirmatory studies on retention rates and safety are needed to proceed with RCVI in the future.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Factor XII-A New Therapeutic Target? A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Neuroinflammation, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Can cell-based therapies bridge the gap between research and reality in the treatment of myocarditis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Regen Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Orally derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of vascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Sci Rep (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Sci Rep - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
From Preservation to Repair: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Organ Rehabilitation During Normothermic Ex Vivo Machine Perfusion
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 12 on Cardiovascular Disease, Immune Modulation, published in Transplant Direct (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 12
Transplant Direct - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev