Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Retrospective comparison of surgical treatment modalities in 100 patients with oral submucous fibrosis.

Mehrotra D., Pradhan R., Gupta S.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 100 on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (2009) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (2009)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
100
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19217007
DOI
10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.012

Abstract (original English)

Oral submucous fibrosis has been a scourge of southeastern Asia and its residents since time immemorial. Scores of medicinal agents, singly and in combination, have been tried with not very encouraging results. In this study, therefore, we have restricted ourselves to different surgical modalities in the management of this condition and have tried to lay down indications of each surgical procedure. A total of 100 patients of oral submucous fibrosis were included in this study and randomly allocated to different surgical groups, 25 patients per group. After excision of fibrous bands, group I had buccal fat pad graft, group II had tongue flap, group III had nasolabial fold flap, and group IV had split skin graft for correction of mucosal defect created after incising the fibrous bands. Mean preoperative mouth opening was 14.82 (SD 4.38) mm and ranged between 4.00 and 25.00 mm. Statistically there was no significant difference among the 4 groups (P = .996). Mean postoperative mouth opening at 1 week was 35.79 (3.53) mm, ranging between 24.00 and 42.00 mm. Mean postoperative mouth opening at 1 month in group I was 36.36 (2.64) mm, in group II 35.36 (29) mm, in group III 35.64 (2.94) mm, and in group IV 35.80 (3.24) mm. Total score for pain, esthetics, and function at 1 month after surgery was highest (11.29) in group I, indicating better results. The results were very encouraging,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdolescentAdultAge DistributionAgedArecaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research