Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

A Review of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Risk Factors, Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies

Alvikas J., Dahiya S., Dubrovsky G.

Narrative Review on Autoimmune Research, published in Cancers (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cancers (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40940838
PMCID
PMC12427430
DOI
10.3390/cancers17172741
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious yet far too common complication following distal pancreatectomy (DP), as it affects 20-30% of patients after DP. POPF raises the risk of other complications and causes delays to a patient's oncologic care. In this review, we present the latest data on patient risk factors for developing POPF, such as obesity, smoking, young age, thick pancreas, lack of epidural anesthesia, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated drain amylase levels. Other risk factors that have been identified with irregular consistency include open surgical approach, non-malignant or neuroendocrine tumor pathology, simultaneous splenectomy, simultaneous vascular resection, and long operative time. We also review the consequences of POPF, which include hemorrhage, infection, delayed gastric emptying, re-operation, re-admission, delays in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, reduced progression-free survival, and reduced overall survival. Finally, we present strategies that have been studied for avoiding POPF after DP, including reducing pressure at the sphincter of Oddi, the use of sealants and patches, optimizing pancreatic transection, strategies for post-operative drain placement, the use of post-operative somatostatin analogues, and pre-clinical studies of experimental devices and techniques that may inform future trials. This review informs readers on the current s

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research