Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

A review of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering with a focus on wound healing and anti-aging

Ganesan O., Kiwanuka H., Hamaguchi R., Orgill DP.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Surg (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40538820
PMCID
PMC12176865
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1504563
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering explore the potential to enhance human healing, which is often limited by wound contraction, scarring, loss of function, and decreased quality of life. Biomaterials like synthetic scaffolds and implantable devices have been developed to circumvent the body's limited natural ability to heal, however, they may introduce their own complications such as toxic side effects. Advances in cell-based therapies, especially those involving embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), offer an enhanced ability to regenerate, circumventing limitations of biomaterials and the body's limited ability to heal. There have been many recent advances in cell-therapies, both scaffold-based and scaffold-free products. Additionally, non-cell-based therapies are gaining traction in wound healing. These products, utilizing their ability to affect the principles of wound healing, have applications in anti-aging. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. These technologies remain costly, may compromise ethical tenets, and may introduce safety risks. Future work should address these challenges.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research