Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Rheological Characterization of Different Fat-Derived Products.

Xue M., Zhang Q., Wang X., Liu J., Xue Z., Lu F.

Animal Study on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthet Surg J (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2025)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40576796
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjaf066

Abstract (original English)

Background Fat grafting has been widely used to correct soft-tissue volume loss and facial rejuvenation. Recent innovative advances have led to different types of fat-derived products. Although the composition of cells and extracellular matrix within different fat products has been reported, their physical and rheological properties are poorly defined. Objectives The authors of this study aim to evaluate the rheological properties of different fat-derived products and assess how these properties change after transplantation. Methods In this study, the authors assessed the rheological properties of 4 fat-derived products-adipose matrix complex AMCs, high-density fat (HDF), stromal vascular fraction-gel (SVF-gel), and Coleman fat-before and after transplantation. Key parameters, including elastic modulus (G'), viscous modulus (G″), tan delta (tan δ), and yield stress (τy), were measured using a rheometer. Results Before transplantation, AMC exhibited the highest G' and G″, followed by SVF-gel, HDF, and Coleman fat. After transplantation, G' decreased for all products, indicating reduced elasticity, while G″ increased, suggesting increased viscosity. AMC maintained the highest G' and G″ even after 3 months, with SVF-gel and HDF showing similar values. Coleman fat had the lowest G' and G″ at all time points. Conclusions Fat-derived products have distinct clinical applications based

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
RheologyRejuvenationAdipose TissueStromal Vascular FractionElastic ModulusViscosityHumansCosmetic TechniquesMaleFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research