Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

The role of erythropoietin-loaded hydrogel versus adipose derived stem cell secretome in the regeneration of tongue defects.

El-Qashty R., Youssef J., Hany E.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in BMC Oral Health (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
BMC Oral Health (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39294639
PMCID
PMC11411902
DOI
10.1186/s12903-024-04835-0
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Background Tongue defects have several etiologies and significantly affect the quality of life. This study was conducted to compare the regenerative potential of erythropoietin (EPO)-loaded hydrogel and adipose derived stem cell (ADSC) secretome on tongue dorsum defects focusing on the role of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype. Methods Rats were subjected to induction of mechanical circular defects on the dorsal surface of the tongue, then divided into three groups; Group I (control): received 0.1 ml phosphate buffered saline, Group II (EPO): received 5000 U/kg EPO-hydrogel, and Group III (ADSC-Secretome): received 0.1 ml ADSC-Secretome. Treatments were injected circumferentially around wound margins after induction. Seven and fourteen days after treatment, specimens were obtained and processed for histological and immunohistochemical staining followed by the relevant histomorphometric and statistical analyses. Results Seven days after treatment, groups II and III presented defects with some epithelial regeneration at the lateral margins, while the center of the defect showed granulation tissue with much inflammatory cells. The base of the defects showed some muscle fibers and new blood vessels, however group III showed more enhanced neovascularization. Fourteen days after therapeutic intervention, group II defects were completely covered with epithelium showing a thin

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsMaleRatsAdipose TissueErythropoietinHydrogelsMacrophagesNeovascularization, PhysiologicRats, WistarRegeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research