Simple Medial Meniscus Posterior Horn Root Repair Using an All-Inside Meniscal Repair Device Combined with High Tibial Osteotomy to Maintain Joint-Space Width in a Patient with a Repairable Tear
Suh DW., Yeo WJ., Han SB., So SY., Kyung BS.
Prospective Study with a reported sample of 81 on Meniscus Injury, published in Indian J Orthop (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Indian J Orthop (2021)
- Reported sample size
- 81
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33927818
- PMCID
- PMC8046862
- DOI
- 10.1007/s43465-020-00234-z
- Citations
- 13
Abstract (original English)
Purpose To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes using simple medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) root repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device combined with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and HTO alone. Methods Between November 2013 and December 2016, patients treated for MMPH root tear along with HTO were enrolled. Based on the tear gap, the participants were divided into repairable ( 2 mm) categories. The participants in each group were divided into those amenable to simple MMPH root repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device and those that required no procedure for meniscus. Radiological parameters including mechanical femorotibial alignment (MA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and medial joint-space width (JSW) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 years. For clinical evaluation, the WOMAC score was determined at the 2-year visit postoperatively. Results A total of 81 knees including 48 repairable (group R) and 33 unrepairable (group I) knees were enrolled. A total of 43 knees underwent simple MMPH root repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device (subgroup r ), whereas the other 38 knees did not (subgroup n ). The MA, PTS, and their postoperative changes as well as the WOMAC scores showed no differences. However, the JSW in group Rr increased from 3.1 to 3.6 mm, but decreased from 3.7 to 3.4 in group Rn, which was a statisticall
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Optimizing Meniscus Allograft Transplantation - Reducing Extrusion and Restoring Joint Loading Mechanics: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging biologic augmentation strategies for meniscal repair: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 18 on Meniscus Injury, Chronic Wound, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
- n = 18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord7 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors and Potential Treatments
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Cureus (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Cureus1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 1: adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2022
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc40 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapy in soft tissue sports injuries of the knee: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 9 on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Expert Opin Biol Ther (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
- n = 9
Expert Opin Biol Ther10 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Stem cells application in meniscal tears: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical evidence.
Systematic Review on Meniscus Injury, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci