Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

In situ forming injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and wound repair

Dimatteo R., Darling NJ., Segura T.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29567395
PMCID
PMC6003852
DOI
10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.007
Citations
553

Abstract (original English)

Hydrogels have been utilized in regenerative applications for many decades because of their biocompatibility and similarity in structure to the native extracellular matrix. Initially, these materials were formed outside of the patient and implanted using invasive surgical techniques. However, advances in synthetic chemistry and materials science have now provided researchers with a library of techniques whereby hydrogel formation can occur in situ upon delivery through standard needles. This provides an avenue to minimally invasively deliver therapeutic payloads, fill complex tissue defects, and induce the regeneration of damaged portions of the body. In this review, we highlight these injectable therapeutic hydrogel biomaterials in the context of drug delivery and tissue regeneration for skin wound repair.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsDrug Delivery SystemsTissue EngineeringWound HealingParticle Size

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research