Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMC

In Situ Forming Nutritional and Temperature Sensitive Scaffold Improves the Esthetic Outcomes of Meshed Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in a Porcine Model

Pourghadiri A., Alnojeidi H., Jalili R., Kilani RT., Nabai L., Ghahary A.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32320360
PMCID
PMC7876349
DOI
10.1089/wound.2019.1108
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Objective: Full-thickness burn wounds require immediate coverage, and the primary clinical approaches comprise of skin allografts and autografts. The use of allografts is often temporary due to the antigenicity of allografts. In contrast, the availability of skin autografts may be limited in large burn injuries. In such cases, skin autografts can be expanded through the use of a skin mesher, creating meshed split-thickness skin grafts (MSTSGs). MSTSGs have revolutionized the treatment of large full-thickness burn injuries since the 1960s. However, contractures and poor esthetic outcomes remain a problem. We previously formulated and prepared an in situ forming skin substitute, called MeshFill (MF), which can conform to complex shapes and contours of wounds. The objective of this study was to assess the esthetic and wound healing outcomes in full-thickness wounds treated with a combination of MF and MSTSG in a porcine model. Approach: Either MSTSGs or MSTSG+MF was applied to full-thickness excisional wounds in Yorkshire pigs. Wound healing outcomes were assessed using histology, immunohistochemistry, and wound surface area analysis from day 10 to 60. Clinical evaluation of wounds were utilized to assess esthetic outcomes. Results: The results demonstrated that the combination of MSTSGs and MF improved wound healing and esthetic outcomes. Innovation: Effects of MSTSGs and reconst

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsSwineBurnsDisease Models, AnimalSkin TransplantationSkin, ArtificialEstheticsTemperatureWound HealingFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research