Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A Standardized Method of Isolating Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Clinical Applications.

Raposio E., Caruana G., Petrella M., Bonomini S., Grieco MP.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Ann Plast Surg (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Ann Plast Surg (2016)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
26418805
DOI
10.1097/SAP.0000000000000609
Citations
38

Abstract (original English)

White adipose tissue is the most abundant and accessible source of stem cells in the adult human body. In this paper, we present a standardised and safe method of isolating and maximizing the number of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) from conventional liposuction for clinical applications, which was carried out through both mechanical (centrifuge) and enzymatic (collagenase) means. Isolated cells were characterized through flow cytometry assay. Gathered data showed a greater amount (9.06 × 10(5) ASCs from 100 mL of adipose tissue) of isolated ASCs compared to previous protocol, also with high (99%) cell vitality; the procedure we presented is easy and fast (80 minutes), allowing collecting a significative number of mesenchymal stem cells, which can be used for clinical purposes, such as wound healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultCell SeparationCell SurvivalFlow CytometryHumansLipectomySensitivity and SpecificityStem Cell TransplantationStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research