Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Stem-Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer and Platelet-Rich Plasma in Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review.

Giannakaki AG., Stylianaki A., Giannakaki MN., Koura S., Papachatzopoulou E., Papapanagiotou I.

Narrative Review on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40399731
PMCID
PMC12618409
DOI
10.1007/s00266-025-04921-w
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Autologous fat transplantation to the breast, a minimal invasive technique, has significantly expanded in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery over the past two decades. Initially used for lumpectomy defects or correcting contour deformities post-breast reconstruction, it is now also performed as a stand-alone technique for primary breast augmentation or as a complementary method to implant-based augmentation. However, this surgical technique is associated with a high absorption rate. The use of fat grafts for breast augmentation remains controversial due to concerns about its safety, efficacy, and impact on breast cancer. Methods This review examines the literature on cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) and PRP-assisted lipotransfer, comparing fat graft survival, complication rates, and oncological safety with conventional autologous lipotransfer. Results CAL and PRP-assisted lipotransfer techniques demonstrate improved fat graft retention and reduced complications compared to conventional methods. Several studies report a potential reduction in the absorption rate of fat grafts with improvements in aesthetic outcomes. Conclusions While CAL and PRP-assisted lipotransfer have shown promising results in enhancing fat graft survival and reducing complications, there are still concerns about their oncological safety. No level assigned This journal requires that authors ass

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansPlatelet-Rich PlasmaMammaplastyFemaleAdipose TissueGraft SurvivalTreatment OutcomeEstheticsTransplantation, AutologousStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research