Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for renal repair: do cardiovascular comorbidities matter?

Eirin A., Lerman LO.

Narrative Review on Chronic Kidney Disease, published in Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31630544
PMCID
PMC6962508
DOI
10.1152/ajprenal.00434.2019
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Extracellular vesicle (EV)-based regenerative therapy has shown promising results in preclinical models of renal disease and might be useful for patients with several forms of chronic kidney disease. However, individuals with chronic kidney disease often present with comorbidities, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, or even metabolic syndrome, which may alter the endogenous characteristics and impair the reparative capacity of stem cells and their daughter EVs. This brief review summarizes evidence of alterations in the morphology, cargo, and function of mesenchymal stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs in the face of cardiovascular disease. We further discuss the important ramifications for their use in patients with kidney disease.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansCardiovascular DiseasesMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research