Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Adipose Tissue: A Comparison of Immune Modulation and Angiogenic Potential.

Tran TDX., Pham VQ., Tran NN., Dang HCN., Tran NTA., Vu NB.

Laboratory Study on Immune Modulation, published in Adv Exp Med Biol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Adv Exp Med Biol (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35389201
DOI
10.1007/5584_2022_708
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

In recent years, both stromal vascular fraction (SVF) from adipose tissue and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from adipose tissues were extensively used in both preclinical and clinical treatment for various diseases. Some studies reported differences in treatment efficacy between SVFs and MSCs in animals as well as in humans. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate the immune modulation and angiogenic potential of SVFs and MSCs from the same SVF samples to support an explanation when SVFs or MSCs should be used. The adipose tissue samples from ten female donors with consent forms were collected. SVFs from these samples were isolated according to the published protocols. The existence of mesenchymal cells that positive with CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105 and endothelial progenitor cells that positive with CD31 and CD34 was determined using flow cytometry. Three samples of SVFs with similar percentages of mesenchymal cell portion and endothelial progenitor cell portion were used to isolate MSCs. Obtained MSCs were confirmed as MSCs using the ISCT minimal criteria. To compare the immune modulation of SVF and MSCs, the mixed lymphocyte assay was used. The lymphocyte proliferation, as well as IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha concentrations, were determined. To compare the angiogenic potential, the angiogenesis in quail embryo assay was used. The angiogenesis efficacy was measured based on the

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research