Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

A Study on the Effective Ratio of Fat to Stromal Vascular Fraction for Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer.

Bae YC., Kim KH., Yun HJ., Oh CH., Chang JH., Yi CR.

Animal Study on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31792563
DOI
10.1007/s00266-019-01548-6
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

Background Fat grafting, used for soft tissue augmentation during aesthetic or reconstructive plastic surgery, has disadvantages of low efficiency and unpredictable resorption rate. As an alternative, cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) is widely used because of its simplicity and low fat resorption rate. However, relevant studies on optimal CAL parameters are still lacking. Here, we aimed to identify the most effective ratio of fat to stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for CAL. Methods We designed two experimental paradigms. The first involved four groups of mice, each group injected with varying ratios of fat and SVF purified from different amounts of fat from a fixed amount of harvested fat. The second experiment involved four groups of mice, each injected with varying amounts of SVF mixed with a fixed amount of fat tissue. The amount of surviving fat in both experiments was compared 8 weeks after fat transplantation. Results In the first experiment, the group injected with only fat, without consuming any of the harvested fat for SVF purification, showed the greatest mean volume and weight. In the second experiment, groups with 1:1 or more ratio of fat to SVF showed greater volume and weight than the group without SVF. Notably, a ratio of 1:1 did not give significantly different results than higher ratios. Conclusions Thus, when a limited amount of fat tissue is available, using a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsEstheticsMicePlastic Surgery Procedures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research