Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Targeting Epicardial/Pericardial Adipose Tissue in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy

Ding Y., Lin F., Liu Z., Zhou X., Liang X.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Rev Cardiovasc Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Rev Cardiovasc Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40160564
PMCID
PMC11951288
DOI
10.31083/rcm26128
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a global health concern, prompting ongoing research into novel contributors to their pathogenesis. Due to the proximity of the coronary arteries and the myocardium in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and pericardial adipose tissue (PAT), these tissues have emerged as key areas of interest for their potential influence on cardiac function and vascular health. This review synthesizes current research on the physiological and biological characteristics of EAT and PAT, exploring their composition and clinical measurement approaches. The roles of EAT and PAT in coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, and heart failure are discussed, and the contributions of EAT and PAT to these cardiovascular conditions are highlighted alongside their potential as therapeutic targets.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research