Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Therapeutic application of adipose derived stem cells in acute myocardial infarction: lessons from animal models.

Naaijkens BA., van Dijk A., Kamp O., Krijnen PA., Niessen HW., Juffermans LJ.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Inflammation, published in Stem Cell Rev Rep (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Stem Cell Rev Rep (2014)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24577790
DOI
10.1007/s12015-014-9502-7
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

The majority of patients survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Their outcome is negatively influenced by post-AMI events, such as loss of viable cardiomyocytes due to a post-AMI inflammatory response, eventually resulting in heart failure and/or death. Recent pre-clinical animal studies indicate that mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue (ASC) are new promising candidates that may facilitate cardiovascular regeneration in the infarcted myocardium. In this review we have compared all animal studies in which ASC were used as a therapy post-AMI and have focused on aspects that might be important for future successful clinical application of ASC.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocardial Infarction

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research