SVF
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic Review

Therapeutic Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and Their Secretome in Reversible Alopecias: A Systematic Review.

Ortega-Cuartiella A.

Systematic Review on Hair Loss, Hair Regeneration, published in Int J Trichology (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Int J Trichology (2023)
Country
India
Reported sample size
—
PMID
39170092
DOI
10.4103/ijt.ijt_3_21

Abstract (original English)

Androgenic alopecia (AGA) and alopecia areata (AA) are two highly prevalent conditions, affecting both men and women of a wide range of ages, which strongly impact their quality of life and self-esteem. Both pathologies are deemed to be reversible, although conventional therapies have shown limited scope and efficacy. New therapeutic approaches, focusing on the degenerative changes that take place in the hair follicle, are needed to achieve better outcomes. For instance, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), abundant and easy to obtain, hold great potential in follicular regeneration. ADSCs can be isolated as stromal vascular fraction (SVF) by the enzymatic digestion of the lipoaspirate or as nanofat by the mechanical breakdown of adipocytes. In addition, commercial preparations of the conditioned medium of the ADSCs secretome (ADSC-conditionate medium [CM]) have entered the market as an appealing alternative because of their comparatively lower cost and accessibility. A search was conducted, crossing relevant terms, on PubMed Central and Google Scholar. Criteria for inclusion were studies in the past 10 years on humans with AGA or AA, where either SVF, nanofat, or ADSC-CM was tested as the main treatment. Eleven publications qualified: two studied nanofat, three, ADSC-CM, and six, SVF, either individually or in combination with other therapies. Only one randomized controlled tria

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
Hair & ScalpHair LossHair Regeneration
View on PubMedDOI

Related research