Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Therapeutic Potential and Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Coronary Artery Disease: Narrative Review.

Patel T., Mešić J., Meretzki S., Bronshtein T., Brlek P., Kivity V.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Immune Modulation, published in Int J Mol Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40508220
PMCID
PMC12156323
DOI
10.3390/ijms26115414
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical and interventional therapies. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has emerged as a promising regenerative approach for patients with refractory or non-revascularizable CAD. MSCs exhibit unique immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic, and anti-fibrotic properties, primarily through paracrine mechanisms involving the secretion of cytokines, growth factors, and exosomal microRNAs. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated improvements in myocardial perfusion, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and functional capacity following MSC-based interventions, particularly in patients with low baseline LVEF and heightened inflammation. Various MSC sources-including bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord-offer distinct advantages, while delivery strategies such as intracoronary, intramyocardial, intravenous, and subcutaneous administration impact cell retention and efficacy. Advances in genetic modification, hypoxic preconditioning, and exosome-based therapies aim to enhance MSC survival and therapeutic potency. However, challenges persist regarding cell engraftment, cryopreservation effects, and inter-patient variability. Moving toward precision cell therapy, future approaches may involve stratifying patients by inflammatory status, ischemic burden, and com

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCoronary Artery DiseaseMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimals

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research