Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Three-dimensional cell culture (3DCC) improves secretion of signaling molecules of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).

Al-Shaibani MBH.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Biotechnol Lett (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biotechnol Lett (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35000031
DOI
10.1007/s10529-021-03216-9

Abstract (original English)

The secretome of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), also called MSC-conditioned media (MSC-CM), represents one of the promising strategies for cellular therapy and tissue repair and regeneration. MSC-CM contains growth factors and cytokines that control many cellular responses during development and regeneration. Traditional 2D cell culture (2DCC) has previously been used to generate MSC-CM while evidence has proved that the physiological and biological behaviors of cells in 2DCC are significantly different from those in 3D cell culture (3DCC). Therefore, the objective is to compare the content of MSC-CM generated from traditional 2DCC and 3DCC using a 3D scaffold. Adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) were isolated from four donors (N = 4) and characterized according to the criteria stipulated by the International Society for Cell Therapy (ISCT). MSCs at passage 3 were grown in traditional 2DCC until 70% confluence and MSC-CM were collected at 24, 48, and 94 h. On the other hand, MSCs at passage 3 were grown on a polystyrene scaffold for 10 days to generate a 3D model of MSCs, and then MSC-CM was collected at 24, 48, and 94 h. MSC-CM from both 2DCC and 3DCC were analyzed for protein content using ELISA. Haematoxylin eosin (HE) staining and immunofluorescence (IF) were used to characterize the 3DCC of MSCs. MSCs from 2DCC were fibroblast like cells, and flow cytometry showed they w

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCulture Media, ConditionedMesenchymal Stem CellsWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research