Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Tissue engineering strategies hold promise for the repair of articular cartilage injury

Yang C., Chen R., Chen C., Yang F., Xiao H., Geng B.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, Chronic Wound, published in Biomed Eng Online (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomed Eng Online (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39261876
PMCID
PMC11389311
DOI
10.1186/s12938-024-01260-w
Citations
15

Abstract (original English)

Articular cartilage damage and wear can result in cartilage degeneration, ultimately culminating in osteoarthritis. Current surgical interventions offer limited capacity for cartilage tissue regeneration and offer only temporary alleviation of symptoms. Tissue engineering strategies are increasingly recognized as promising modalities for cartilage restoration. Currently, various biological scaffolds utilizing tissue engineering materials are extensively employed in both fundamental and clinical investigations of cartilage repair. In order to optimize the cartilage repair ability of tissue engineering scaffolds, researchers not only optimize the structure and properties of scaffolds from the perspective of materials science and manufacturing technology to enhance their histocompatibility, but also adopt strategies such as loading cells, cytokines, and drugs to promote cartilage formation. This review provides an overview of contemporary tissue engineering strategies employed in cartilage repair, as well as a synthesis of existing preclinical and clinical research. Furthermore, the obstacles faced in the translation of tissue engineering strategies to clinical practice are discussed, offering valuable guidance for researchers seeking to address these challenges.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringRegenerationWound HealingTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research