Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMedOpen access

Treatment of human chronic wounds with autologous extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel: A STROBE-compliant study.

Deng C., Wang L., Feng J., Lu F.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Medicine (Baltimore) (2018)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30095623
PMCID
PMC6133447
DOI
10.1097/MD.0000000000011667
Citations
46

Abstract (original English)

Stem cell therapy is considered as the most promising treatment for chronic wounds. Extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel (ECM/SVF gel), an adipose-derived stem cell-based cytotherapy, has shown healing potential in experimental wounds in animal models. However, the effects of ECM/SVF gel on human chronic wounds have not been investigated. The aim of the present study is to investigate the therapeutic effect of ECM/SVF gel on human chronic wounds.Autologous ECM/SVF gel was prepared and used to treat patients with chronic wounds in clinics, with negative pressure wound therapy as the positive control. Wound healing rate per week and histological changes were performed.The average wound healing rate per week in the ECM/SVF gel group was 34.55 ± 11.18% compared with 10.16 ± 2.67% in the negative pressure wound therapy group (P < .001). Histological analysis with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome staining, and CD31 immunohistochemistry showed less lymphocyte infiltration, more collagen accumulation, and more newly formed vessels in the ECM/SVF gel group treated skins compared to the control.ECM/SVF gel is an effective therapeutic option for chronic wound healing in clinics.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAgedCytological TechniquesExtracellular MatrixFemaleGelsHumansInjectionsMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research