Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Tumor-on-a-chip model for advancement of anti-cancer nano drug delivery system

Tian C., Zheng S., Liu X., Kamei KI.

Clinical Trial on Hip, published in J Nanobiotechnology (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
J Nanobiotechnology (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
35858898
PMCID
PMC9301849
DOI
10.1186/s12951-022-01552-0
Citations
32

Abstract (original English)

Despite explosive growth in the development of nano-drug delivery systems (NDDS) targeting tumors in the last few decades, clinical translation rates are low owing to the lack of efficient models for evaluating and predicting responses. Microfluidics-based tumor-on-a-chip (TOC) systems provide a promising approach to address these challenges. The integrated engineered platforms can recapitulate complex in vivo tumor features at a microscale level, such as the tumor microenvironment, three-dimensional tissue structure, and dynamic culture conditions, thus improving the correlation between results derived from preclinical and clinical trials in evaluating anticancer nanomedicines. The specific focus of this review is to describe recent advances in TOCs for the evaluation of nanomedicine, categorized into six sections based on the drug delivery process: circulation behavior after infusion, endothelial and matrix barriers, tumor uptake, therapeutic efficacy, safety, and resistance. We also discuss current issues and future directions for an end-use perspective of TOCs.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansNeoplasmsMicrofluidicsNanomedicineLab-On-A-Chip DevicesTumor MicroenvironmentNanoparticle Drug Delivery System

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research