Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Tuning Secretomes for Regenerative Medicine

Buschmann J.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Biology (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biology (Basel) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42345797
PMCID
PMC13296092
DOI
10.3390/biology15120941

Abstract (original English)

In this narrative review, the systematic tailoring of cell-derived secretomes for regenerative medicine is comprehensively discussed. The review begins by evaluating a diverse array of cell sources, including platelets, endothelial cells, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, tenocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). From this foundation, we critically analyze how modulating cell culture conditions can be used to directly influence the therapeutic and paracrine profiles of the resulting secretomes. Specifically, we address the impact of the following critical parameters on secretome fabrication: (i) Culture Medium Supplementation: The use of defined media, supplements, and chemical priming agents. (ii) Cell Cultivation Formats: A comparative analysis of 2D monolayer cultures versus 3D spheroids. (iii) Culture Duration and Fluidics: The effects of culture time alongside static versus dynamic culture systems. (iv) Microenvironmental Stress: The influence of varying oxygen levels (for example, hypoxia) and induced oxidative stress on secretory output.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research