Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMed

Uncultured adipose-derived regenerative cells promote peripheral nerve regeneration.

Suganuma S., Tada K., Hayashi K., Takeuchi A., Sugimoto N., Ikeda K.

Randomized Controlled Trial on Chronic Wound, published in J Orthop Sci (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
J Orthop Sci (2012)
Country
Japan
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
22948962
DOI
10.1007/s00776-012-0306-9
Citations
48

Abstract (original English)

Background We examined whether or not peripheral nerves can be regenerated using uncultured adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs). We also searched for humoral factors that might promote the proliferation or migration of Schwann cells. Methods Thirty rats were randomly assigned to three groups. A 10 mm sciatic nerve defect was bridged using a silicon tube filled with physiological saline (control group), type I collagen gel (collagen group), and a mixture of ADRCs and type I collagen gel (ADRC group). The regenerated tissues were studied two weeks after surgery. Results Continuity of regenerated tissue was observed in all rats in the control group and the ADRC group. In the collagen group, only two rats had a bridge of thin tissue, which was barely visible macroscopically. Protein gene product 9.5 staining confirmed significantly faster regeneration in the ADRC group. The distributions of the PKH-26 positive areas and the S-100 protein positive areas were different, suggesting that the transplanted cells had not differentiated into Schwann cells. In real-time RT-PCR, neuregulin-1 (Neu-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression were detected in uncultured ADRCs before transplantation. The regenerated tissue in the ADRC group had higher levels of Neu-1 and VEGFA expression than the control group. Conclusions ADRCs promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Th

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression RegulationImmunohistochemistryNerve RegenerationRNA, MessengerRatsRats, Wistar

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research