Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Urine-derived stem cells in kidney disease: progress, challenges, and future directions

Atay JCL., Boysen AT., Nørregaard R.

Narrative Review on Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42036721
PMCID
PMC13255488
DOI
10.1186/s13287-026-05040-2

Abstract (original English)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health burden with limited treatment options that address the underlying causes of fibrosis or promote regeneration. Urine-derived stem cells (USCs) have emerged as a promising tool in regenerative nephrology, offering a non-invasive and accessible source of multipotent cells with therapeutic potential. Sharing key properties with mesenchymal stem cells, USCs demonstrate paracrine activity, immunomodulation, and efficient extracellular vesicle (EV) production, and have shown anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and pro-regenerative effects in preclinical models of acute and chronic kidney injury. Recent advances in biomaterials and delivery technologies, including scaffold-free cell sheets and engineered EVs, have further enhanced the potential of USC-based therapies. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding functional integration, delivery optimization, and donor variability. This review summarizes the current progress in USC-based kidney therapy, identifies key limitations, and outlines future directions to support the translation of USC-based interventions into clinical practice.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsUrineAnimalsHumansKidney DiseasesStem Cell TransplantationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research