Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Use of genetics in the prediction of success in male pattern hair loss therapy and mechanistic studies

Torres de Souza G., Williams G., Vicente Silva CC., Chiovatto CB., Epstein GK., Vila-Vecilla L.

Narrative Review on Hair Loss, published in Front Pharmacol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Pharmacol (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41769701
PMCID
PMC12935645
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2026.1765808

Abstract (original English)

Male pattern hair loss, the clinical manifestation of androgenetic alopecia in men, is a highly prevalent chronic condition associated with significant psychosocial burden, yet current therapies show heterogeneous efficacy and tolerability between individuals. Over the past decade, genome wide association and sequencing studies have identified hundreds of susceptibility loci that converge on androgen signalling, WNT pathways, prostaglandin metabolism, extracellular matrix remodelling, vascular regulation, telomere biology, and cellular metabolism, indicating that male pattern hair loss is mechanistically tractable and strongly genetically determined. In parallel, pharmacogenetic work has linked variants in genes involved in minoxidil bioactivation, 5α-reductase isoenzyme activity, prostaglandin synthesis, collagen organisation, and vascular tone to differences in treatment response. In this narrative review, we integrate evidence from large genetic studies, targeted pharmacogenetic cohorts, transcriptomic and pathway analyses, and preclinical models to delineate how genetic architecture informs disease mechanisms and modulates the effects of established therapies such as topical and oral minoxidil, finasteride, dutasteride, and prostaglandin-directed approaches. We also discuss emerging targets, including IGF1R, WNT10A, PPARGC1A, and prolactin receptor signalling, and examine h

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research