Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Use of paracrine factors from stem cells to treat local radiation burns in rats

Temnov A., Astrelina T., Rogov K., Moroz B., Lebedev V., Nasonova T.

Laboratory Study on Burns, published in Stem Cells Cloning (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cells Cloning (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
30464536
PMCID
PMC6208552
DOI
10.2147/sccaa.s164630
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Background Mesenchymal stem cells based paracrine bioactive factors that deploy their task as an essential mechanism, but their efficiency for skin regeneration still requires clarification. Methods The mesenchymal stem cell-based paracrine factors were administered by subcutaneous injection of 0.5 mL peptides (general protein 8 mg/mL). These were performed after radiation on different days like the first, third, sixth, eighth, and 10th. To determine the consequences, we performed photography, planimetry, and preclinical test each week after 15 days of radiation. MSC-based peptides were injected into a rat that had radiation burns, and its observation encouraged cell-free therapeutic remedies to regenerate skin. Both control and experimental groups were exposed to 110 Gy of X-rays, which resulted in the formation of localized radiation burns on the skin ( S =6 cm 2 ) 15 days later. Thirty days after radiation, the wound stabilized (surface of the wound was S =2.2±0.2 cm 2 ) and fluctuated throughout the course of the pathological process. Results The wounded area on the skin from the 15th to the 29th day after radiation was practically the same in both groups. The wounded area gradually reduced by 6.1±0.4 cm 2 (experimental group) and 5.9±0.6 cm 2 (control group) 15 days after radiation up to 2.2±0.3 cm 2 (in both control and experimental groups) on the 29th day after radiation

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research